Search for: "USA v. GRANT" Results 661 - 680 of 3,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC (7/30/12) 208 Cal.App.4th 26, review granted 10/24/12 (Case No. 205263) and briefing deferred pending Iskanian: Putative consumer class action under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the Unfair Competition Law (UCL), and other California statutes. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 9:15 am by INFORRM
On 6 September 2024 Steyn J handed down judgment in the case of Parish v Wikimedia Foundation [2024] EWHC 2301 (KB) [doc] setting aside an order granting the claimant permission to serve the defendant out of the jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Petitions Granted with immediate Vacatur and Remand (GVR) Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
At Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman analyzes Wednesday’s oral argument in the patent case Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:21 pm by Steven B. Katz
Mercedes-Benz Financial Services USA LLC, 145 Cal.Rptr.3d 296 (2012) (rev. granted, briefing held pending Iskanian); Franco v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
’” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen observes that the court may decide as early as today not only whether to grant review in Gill v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:09 am
However, if the applicant responds to the PTO immediately after receiving the search report by informing the PTO that he wishes the mark to be registered irrespective of the content of the search report the mark will usually be accepted for registration within weeks instead of awaiting the deadline.If the applicant responds immediately to the search report a national Danish trade mark application is currently processed within 3-4 months".A pretty hopeless appeal against refusal to… [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:01 am by Howard Knopf
For example, because the USA has its famous “absence of malice” defence based upon the landmark New York Times v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am by Conor McEvily
Reporting on Monday’s orders and opinions, particularly the Court’s decision to grant cert. in Arizona v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
Last year, I wrote a not-too-flattering piece on a Texas case where the appellate court in Dallas held that a grant of stock options does not constitute sufficient consideration for an employee non-compete agreement. [read post]