Search for: "United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit" Results 661 - 680 of 1,392
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm by Ashley Remillard
On April 17, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed a district court decision upholding the U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, Case No. 12-1508 & 12-1509. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 11:02 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed on September 8, 1998, only a little over a year from the judgment. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 4:30 am
  Along the way, the Illinois appellate court sees fit to quote a Tenth Circuit opinion “[l]amenting the ‘potential injustice’ created by” Mensing. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:44 am by Maureen Johnston
Des Moines Independent Community School District and the decisions of other United States courts of appeals. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 11:28 am by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
" The Tenth Circuit had a rather convoluted theory that a cross-appeal is only for instances where an appellee wants "more than it obtained by the lower-court judgment" and since the appellee was not seeking alteration of the judgment, they need not file a cross-appeal.In United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:00 am
”  The emphasis is the dissent’s, and the contrary precedents are from the Fourth, Eighth, and Tenth Circuits. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union… [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:00 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The defendants appeal that denial.Under Tenth Circuit law, an assessment of fees under§ 1927 is appropriate “only in instances evidencing aserious . . . disregard for the orderly process of justice. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 10:06 am by Steve Vladeck
” The state’s arguments In response, Michigan pivoted to a different textual argument than that on which the Sixth Circuit relied, focusing on Section 1915(g)’s reference to “an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:21 pm by LTA-Editor
However, the use of this machine was kept under the radar until this past December when the Tenth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:15 am by Epstein Becker Green
Fullerton III On January 26, 2015, in an issue of first impression at the appellate level, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that a federal catch-all four year statute of limitations applies to whistleblower retaliation claims filed in federal court under Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), rather than a two-year statute of limitations applicable to cases alleging fraud under the securities laws. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 9:15 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Fullerton III On January 26, 2015, in an issue of first impression at the appellate level, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that a federal catch-all four year statute of limitations applies to whistleblower retaliation claims filed in federal court under Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), rather than a two-year statute of limitations applicable to cases alleging fraud under the securities laws. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 1:03 pm by Brad Hokanson
Late Filed Returns and Discharging Back Taxes A State of Uncertainty  On December 29, 2014, the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, (In re Mallo, 2014 WL 7360130 (10th Cir. 2014)), followed the Fifth Circuit (In re McCoy, (CA 5 2012) 666 F.3d 924) and several other tax bankruptcy court cases which held that late-filed tax returns cannot be discharged in bankruptcy. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 8:52 am by William Eskridge
Evans and continuing through his recent opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]