Search for: "United States v. Born" Results 661 - 680 of 2,560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
”   Seasoned attorneys—or those who were practicing law before the United States Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Bates v. [read post]
15 May 2025, 5:36 am by Kristin A. Collins
It provides that “a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” shall be a “national[] and citizen[] of the United States at birth. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:17 am by James Bickford
-citizen mothers outside of the United States, and those born to unmarried U.S. [read post]
13 May 2021, 12:23 pm
  He says he's a "derivative citizen" under a particular statute even though his parents were from outside the United States, he wasn't born in the U.S., and he only came here when he was 13, on a nonimmigrant student visa.You can figure out the typical sympathies in en banc cases like this. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged about this in August, but now there’s a District Court decision dismissing the indictment, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 9:47 am by Guest Author
These decisions include Wong Kim Ark, affirming birthright citizenship for all born in the United States and holding that Elk v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:17 pm by Greg Robinson
Legal commentators immediately responded that such a law would be blatantly unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment, which provides that all persons born or naturalized in the United States are citizens. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:06 am by Rosalind English
Vinter and others v United Kingdom (application nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10) – read judgment  The Strasbourg Court has found three British murderers’ imprisonment for life is not inhuman or degrading and therefore not in violation of Article 3. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:17 pm by Brady Iandiorio
Recently, United States District Court Judge Miller ruled in favor of a motion for partial summary judgment in the case of Continental Western Insurance Company v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
Over 25 years ago, the United States Supreme Court answered a narrow legal question about whether the so-called Frye rule was incorporated into Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]