Search for: "United States v. Brennan"
Results 661 - 680
of 711
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2008, 1:52 pm
Brennan. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:52 pm
In many respects, being on the Supreme Court is like being President of the United States. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 5:10 am
Did you understand the “he,” in that email, to refer to the President of the United States? [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
, (IPRoo), WIPO Director General candidates’ presentations to members: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP rights arise in UN debate on the right to participate in cultural life: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP academies agree to galvanise efforts to promote IP education: (WIPO), What business people do to maximise protection of IP: (Ezine @rticles), Lorin Brennan’s memo on interaction between UNICITRAL guide and IP rights: (IP finance), … [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
Many are reported to be seeking asylum.[1] They have active proceedings to determine their status and, pending such determination, are authorized to remain in the United States. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Department of State, respectively: ? [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:31 pm
Conversely, Barrett authored an opinion coded as “liberal” in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 3:00 am
The case was Glossip v. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 7:27 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:42 am
As I explain in the post, within hours after Ali refused to step forward for military induction, the New York State Athletic Commission withdrew his license to fight on the ground that licensing a man who refused induction was “detrimental to the best interests of boxing”; and, within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, thereby effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:49 am
., Sackett v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
United States Secret Service, USSS Timeline of Jan. 6, 2021 (FOIA release on Jun. 29, 2021) 9. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 7:08 am
Souter’s second example is The Supreme Court’s decision in 1954 in Brown v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am
Wiener, co-chair of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act defense practice at Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm
In addition to being strong and thoughtful statements of United States policy, these two speeches provide the framework within which my observations here can be better understood. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Bickel trusted the Court to discern our deepest “fundamental values,” such as a commitment to racial justice that required the invalidation of segregation in Brown v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Furthermore, in deciding the question of whether a bona fide emergency declaration has been made, the decision last spring in Trump v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
” The article also noted that, when the late Justice William Brennan was asked about potential conflict between his Catholic faith and his duties as a justice, he responded that he would be governed by “the oath I took to support the Constitution and laws of the United States. [read post]
