Search for: "United States v. Dean" Results 661 - 680 of 1,357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
Croson Co., the Court struck down the City of Richmond’s minority and female-owned business program as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:00 pm by Richard Gallogly
The Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) today issued a decision in Regis College v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
, which charged a conspiracy to smuggle Southeast Asian artifacts, including from Thailand and Cambodia, into the United States, beginning in 2004;United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
The New Jersey Consumer Fraud Laws New Jersey has some of the most aggressive and comprehensive consumer fraud laws in the United States. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Jay Willis
  At The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the grant – which came less than a week after the Court’s decision in another free-speech case, United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 5:13 pm by Jeanne Huang
Vázquez will focus on developments in the United States, including such recent decisions as Mallory v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Dean v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 5:17 am by Eric Segall
By Eric SegallThere are many parts of the United States Constitution that seem unfair, outdated, and have terrible consequences. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Last but not least — your former Dean. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The excellent questions raised show how fertile a field this is for scholars to till.A few years ago, David Congdon, now the Senior Editor at Kansas, told us it was a high priority of his to issue a book on United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” The third category of the statute thus prefers people who are 65 or older, giving them an entitlement to early voting by mail that younger persons do not enjoy unless they satisfy additional criteria.Plaintiffs challenged this law as violative of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, which provides—also quite straightforwardly—that “[t]he right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied… [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
 Section 2: Any purchase, sale, or other exchange involving goods or services in the United States must be conducted in U.S. dollars. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Court set the tone for its robust judicial review of the executive branch in one of the first of these cases, Hamdi v. [read post]