Search for: "United States v. Earth" Results 661 - 680 of 908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2015, 5:38 am by SHG
   The Supreme Court of the United States is the final arbitrator of constitutionality. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:47 pm by David Greene
It described itself as “the biggest dating blacklist database on earth. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Whatever your feelings about the doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales], it's a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:21 pm by Florian Mueller
"The real-world evidence included, among other things, license deals such as the Apple-HTC settlement and Apple's own 60-cents-per-unit damages claim in the "Posner case" (Apple v. [read post]
11 May 2013, 11:36 am by Schachtman
I don’t believe that the earth’s but about 9,000 years old. [read post]
  If they act beyond those powers, they act unconstitutionally, even if they act at the command of the President of the United States, the head of the Executive branch. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Nor is likely to be a path to the Presidency of the United States of America. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
In 2017, The Atlantic asked, “What on Earth Is Wrong with Connecticut? [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:10 am by SHG
Texas, No. 15-797, the United States Supreme Court will consider whether the Court of Criminal Appeals, Texas’ highest court for criminal matters, went astray last year in upholding the death sentence of Bobby J. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am by Sarah Grant
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 8:05 am by Sarah Grant
Continuing with pretrial proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri—which relates to the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole—military judge Col. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 9:48 pm by Stephen Page
While the US has full faith and credit meaning allowing the portability of orders made in one particular part of the United States to take effect throughout the United States, each state has its own particular rules to do with family law and often there are different rules that apply from county to county. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am by Thornhill Law Firm, A PLC
The even bigger problem is that Congress has treated insurance as a sacred cow since 1945, when the federal government overruled the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Thus, he joined a dissent by Chief Justice Melville Fuller in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 10:40 am by Heather Gerken
One of the key questions at stake is whether Section 5 imposes a heavy burden on the states (an important step in evaluating whether Section 5 is “congruent and proportional,” to use the City of Boerne v. [read post]