Search for: "United States v. Texas" Results 661 - 680 of 8,943
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Alternatively, the alien can be “paroled,” i.e., released into the United States on conditions pending resolution of his application. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm by John Ross
His estate sues the several prison employees under Bivens and the United States via the FTCA. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
The Austin-based federal Western District Court for Texas found the United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Bruen is quite simply a national nightmare.In United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:59 am by Josh Blackman
Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc., 454 U. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Michael Maicher
The case was an appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (District Court). [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm by Josh Blackman
REUVENI: The United States thinks Your Honor can be fair and impartial. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
IN THE NEWS A federal judge temporarily blocked Texas prosecutors from enforcing current and 60-year-old state laws against organizations that help people travel out of state to have abortions. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am by Holly
Prudential, a global insurance company, trademarked PRU and other PRU-formative marks in the United States and other countries (but not China) in 2002. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:40 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This discussion at oral argument was a reprise of SG Prelogar's argument in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm by Guest Author
This discussion at oral argument was a reprise of SG Prelogar’s argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]