Search for: "Williams v. Justice Court"
Results 661 - 680
of 6,644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
He could not do what other Chief Justices had done in cases like Brown v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 1:25 pm
School District v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm
She noted that the “Notorious RBG” meme took hold following her 2013 dissent in Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
Van Orden v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:00 am
Chief Justice William Rehnquist being on the wrong side of almost every civil rights issue over a long career.27. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:15 am
Justice Davis delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 7:56 am
William Albert and Connie J. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:18 am
"A Struggle with the Police & the Law," is Justice John Paul Stevens' third essay in the New York Review of Books since his retirement from the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
As the article noted: The Roberts court, which has completed five terms, ruled for business interests 61 percent of the time, compared with 46 percent in the last five years of the court led by Chief Justice William H. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 8:56 pm
Williams decision, the Supreme Court returned again to a procedural issue and declined to address the issue of ratios. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:20 am
ShareWednesday’s argument in Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:57 am
Other cases to follow: Williams v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:57 am
In 1952 William Rehnquist, the former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, wrote a memo he called “A Random Thought on the Segregation Cases”. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:57 am
In 1952 William Rehnquist, the former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, wrote a memo he called “A Random Thought on the Segregation Cases”. [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:20 am
Wallace Courtroom 2E County Court at Law No. 5 Judge Teana V. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 6:49 am
Sotomayor and Samuel Alito were asked about civil rights--"Doesn't your decision in Ricci, reversed by the Supreme Court, show that you let your personal views influence how you decide cases for those groups you like" "Doesn't your decision in Grove City College, reversed by the Supreme Court, show that you don't like civil rights and let those views influence how you decide cases"--but in entirely result-oriented terms. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 10:47 am
ShareDuring Tuesday’s argument in Santos-Zacaria v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 5:29 am
Beginning with Williams v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:04 am
It is one of the most significant post-Crawford cases dealing with the Clause from the lower courts, and probably the most significant lower-court treatment of the mess resulting from Williams v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
Speaking for the majority, Chief Justice William Howard Taft said private telephone communications were no different from casual conversations overheard in a public place. [read post]
