Search for: "Defendant Doe 2"
Results 6781 - 6800
of 40,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2010, 8:33 am
. , 2:10cv00132 (E.D. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 4:31 am
Plaintiffs alleged that defendant Ms. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:52 am
Based on his own admission, the defendant was convicted of rape pursuant to section 345(a)(2) in one of the cases and of fraudulently receiving a benefit in the others as part of a plea bargain. [read post]
14 May 2015, 11:23 am
§ 3663A(a)(2). [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm
Texas 15-65Issue: Whether Texas’s standard for determining if a capital defendant meets the second prong of the definition of intellectual disability (“deficits in adaptive functioning”) violates the Eighth Amendment in light of Atkins v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 7:59 am
From Doe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:38 am
The notice informed the defendant of the State’s intent to prove that the defendant (1) had two or more prior convictions involving impaired driving within seven years of the instant offense, (2) drove a motor vehicle on a highway while his license was revoked for impaired driving, and (3) caused serious injury to another person. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:38 am
The notice informed the defendant of the State’s intent to prove that the defendant (1) had two or more prior convictions involving impaired driving within seven years of the instant offense, (2) drove a motor vehicle on a highway while his license was revoked for impaired driving, and (3) caused serious injury to another person. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:09 pm
Defendant, her physician, refused to perform it. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:48 am
Florida businesses have sometimes sued for defamation, and the defendant has asserted as a defense that the Florida court does not have “personal jurisdiction” over the defendant. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 12:31 pm
This does not mean that a plaintiff can convert any ordinary breach-of-contract case into a fraud case. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm
Vickers 19-679Issues: (1) Whether qualified immunity is an affirmative defense (placing the burden on the defendant to raise and prove it) or whether it is a pleading requirement (placing the burden on a plaintiff to plead its absence); (2) whether the Supreme Court should recalibrate or reverse the doctrine of qualified immunity. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 8:28 pm
The court noted that the offense of DWI, as defined by New Jersey law, does not specify a required mental state. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 8:31 am
To use res ipsa loquitur, a plaintiff must show “(1) what object or condition caused the injury, (2) that the object or condition that caused the injury is of a kind that does not ordinarily occur in the absence of negligence, and (3) that the instrumentality causing the injury was under the defendant’s exclusive control when the injury occurred. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 8:28 pm
The court noted that the offense of DWI, as defined by New Jersey law, does not specify a required mental state. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 10:48 am
Unlike many of the SPAC-related lawsuits, it does not involve a company in the electric vehicle industry and it does not involve a company that was the subject of a short-seller attack. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 8:31 am
To use res ipsa loquitur, a plaintiff must show “(1) what object or condition caused the injury, (2) that the object or condition that caused the injury is of a kind that does not ordinarily occur in the absence of negligence, and (3) that the instrumentality causing the injury was under the defendant’s exclusive control when the injury occurred. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm
Weekly pay of at least $684 per week on a “salary basis”; 2. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:12 am
” “A motion on the hearing was held Feb. 2. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:26 am
When a case is brought against a governmental entity and “the GTLA does not provide immunity, courts may look to the general rule of immunity under the public duty doctrine. [read post]
