Search for: "Goode v. State" Results 6781 - 6800 of 44,768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" Executive Law §231, amended  effective January 20, 2015, provides that Superintendent of State Police "shall develop and distribute uniform identification cards to all sworn members of New York [S]tate [P]olice, upon such members' retirement in good standing" and the phrase "retirement in good standing" means that the State Police member "retired from his or her employment for reasons other than the avoidance of… [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 12:44 pm
Baker & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government& Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 141. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
 State law prohibits the taking (read: killing) the baby crabs; i.e., any crab under six and one quarter inches in breadth. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:54 pm by William Morriss
About a week later, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments in City of Ontario v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
 Which was what the statute indeed did.Pretty good argument, right? [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 3:02 am by Broc Romanek
We have started posting the hordes of memos in our “Securities Litigation” Practice Area, but here’s analysis from Skadden: The Supreme Court of the United States today in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
I do think that Hershey has stated a pretty good case for a parody but that is not quite what they wanted to do here. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:44 pm by WIMS
For example, wolf reintroduction may have been successful in Yellowstone and Banff, but the record reflects that those parks are not a good comparator for RMNP. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 10:47 am by Mark Tushnet
For reasons not worth going into, I was reading the Supreme Court Review volume for 2013, and found in it a (quite good on its own terms) 100-page article on United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 7:08 am by CMS
The Supreme Court will have to decide whether Gelmini remains good law, following Marren and Pritam Kaur which were both adduced by the claimants. [read post]