Search for: "High v State" Results 6781 - 6800 of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2020, 2:12 pm by Busisiwe Nhlapo
The Constitutional Court in State Information Technology Agency Soc Limited v Gijima Holdings (Pty) Ltd held that a state applicant seeking the judicial review of their own decision may not rely on the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 2000 and must do so in terms of the principle of legality. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:06 am by Edith Roberts
Lamone, a high-profile partisan-gerrymandering challenge by Republican voters to a Democratic-leaning congressional district in Maryland. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:31 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisOpinion Date: 6/21/10Cite: Allison v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 6:48 am
Neither the driver nor the passenger attempted to get gas, and approximately 2–3 minutes later, the Nissan Armada departed the scene in an erratic behavior and at a high rate of speed. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:05 am by Laura Sandwell
R (Reilly & Anor) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 29 July 2013. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
This morning the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in American Express Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:45 pm by Matthew Flinn
Broom v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWHC 2695 (Admin) – Read Judgment When he was transferred from Whitemoor prison to Wakefield Prison in May 2008, Mr. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 12:09 pm by Charles Bieneman
A significant statement of software copyright law has come in a very high-profile case: Java API packages were held not protectable under U.S. copyright law in Oracle America, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 8:55 am by Walter Olson
Several states have done the same. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 11:30 am by Dennis Crouch
 Dmitry Karshtedt This morning’s argument in Oil States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:09 am by TJ McIntyre
Moreover, I note that evidence was submitted in the case stated by Judge Mary Devins in DPP v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
 I suggest that this may be the case because the test for capacity to marry, as stated in Banton v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 4:38 am by Joy Waltemath
’” However, there is tension between Fraelick and the state high court’s decision in Awuah v Coverall N. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:16 am by Vaishali Mittal (Anand and Anand)
Previous orders and guidelines are not conclusive or binding Annexure F of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018 – which states that only advocates and external experts are to form confidentiality clubs in commercial disputes – cannot be invoked because Xiaomi rejected the scheme proposed by InterDigital. [read post]