Search for: "In Re: Does v." Results 6781 - 6800 of 30,372
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
 . and does not play an integral and vital part in the overall production or marketing of [products]”); Shepard v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
  The Davis opinion “expressly refers to drug manufacturers and does not speak to Karl’s role in other circumstances” such as medical devices. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:23 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re notes that “a significant chunk of the briefing” in Heien v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 5:01 am by Joanna Schwartz
First, lower courts can do what Richard Re calls "narrowing from below. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 6:24 am
It's time for the Court of Appeals to re-read its seminal decision in Zappone v. [read post]
 In the judgment, the Court re-emphasises its readiness to set the terms of a global FRAND licence and finds that as between Optis and Apple an annual lump sum of US$5.13m is FRAND for the portion of Optis’ portfolio(s) to which Apple requires a licence (just over 60%).[2] At 283 pages long, the judgment is not a quick read and therefore this article only scratches the surface of its contents. [read post]