Search for: "State v. Mai"
Results 6781 - 6800
of 133,205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2010, 3:55 am
State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Supreme Court found that switching the Members from the 62/5 plan to the 57/5 plan violated Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Supreme Court found that switching the Members from the 62/5 plan to the 57/5 plan violated Article V, §7 of the New York State Constitution. [read post]
15 May 2023, 10:18 am
The case is Carroll v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:26 am
” In Pennsylvania, the Court of Common Pleas for Lycoming County has stated that a public adjuster on a contingent fee may not testify as an expert. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 6:44 am
In Baldassini v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:05 am
” Gonzalez v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:09 am
An individual may be the victim of discriminatory animus that is directed to a third person with whom the individual associates 2015 NY Slip Op 00326, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIn this action, which the court characterized as a “case of first impression for this Court,” one of the issues concerned whether a plaintiff alleging discrimination in employment on the basis of religion in violation of New York State’s Executive Law §296 can establish a… [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 6:07 am
Additional Resources: Ridley v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 5:50 am
In Roberts v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
For example, assertions can reflect a state of mind versus an assertion of truth. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:27 am
[1] E.g., General Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:30 pm
S. 271, which reaffirmed that Congress may choose to tax either the partnership or the partners on the partnership’s undistributed income, even where state law did not allow the partners to personally receive the income; and Helvering v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:52 am
Vindicating an employee's right conferred by law may not be resolved by filing a grievance pursuant to a collective bargaining agreementMarino v Hauppauge UFSD, 262 AD2d 321If a public employee claims that some action by his or her employer violated his or her statutory rights, may the employer insist that the issue be resolved by the employee filing a grievance under a Taylor Law contract grievance procedure? [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:10 am
United States Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, dissenting from the denial of certiorari in Berisha v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:10 am
United States Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, dissenting from the denial of certiorari in Berisha v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:10 am
United States Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, dissenting from the denial of certiorari in Berisha v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 7:35 am
The Rules of Civil Procedure state the following about corporate examinations: (a) the examining party may examine any officer, director or employee on behalf of the corporation, but the court, on motion of the corporation before the examination, may order the examining party to examine another officer, director or employee; and (b) the examining party may examine more than one officer, director or employee only with the consent of the parties or the leave of the… [read post]
20 May 2022, 7:35 am
The Rules of Civil Procedure state the following about corporate examinations: (a) the examining party may examine any officer, director or employee on behalf of the corporation, but the court, on motion of the corporation before the examination, may order the examining party to examine another officer, director or employee; and (b) the examining party may examine more than one officer, director or employee only with the consent of the parties or the leave of the… [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 12:50 pm
Several courts have held that held that the Pennsylvania rule may not apply in Jones Act Cases: Wills v. [read post]
