Search for: "U.S. Judiciary"
Results 6781 - 6800
of 11,663
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Finally, An End—for Now—to Dickey-Wicker Sticky Wickets: On Stem Cell Research and Chevron Deference
24 Aug 2012, 2:40 pm
Circuit will review the decision en banc or that the U.S. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 9:37 am
If a nomination is approved by the Judiciary Committee, the nominee will receive a vote by the full Senate. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:55 pm
In the same vein, the Associated Press reports on the hearing, and on U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:04 am
The 1993 U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:04 am
The 1993 U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
In TLDB Bickel proved himself the faithful acolyte of Felix Frankfurter, for whom he had notably clerked, and of his Harvard Law School professors like Henry Hart and other proponents of a distinctly restrained role for the federal judiciary. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 7:55 am
“Trousers” made it into the U.S. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:12 am
” Making judicial nominations wasn’t a high political priority, so President Barack Obama will be ending his term with just 125 lower-court appointments in the federal judiciary. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:12 am
” Making judicial nominations wasn’t a high political priority, so President Barack Obama will be ending his term with just 125 lower-court appointments in the federal judiciary. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 11:28 am
by Nicole Flatow The “partisan intensity” surrounding the Senate confirmation process of judicial nominees “makes the judiciary look politicized when it is not” and “has to stop,” U.S. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 9:33 am
Comm. on the Judiciary, 112th Cong. (2012) (statement of David J. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:12 pm
United States, 500 U.S. 453, 467, 111 S.Ct. 1919, 114 L.Ed.2d 524 (1991) . [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 2:21 pm
In June 2012, Teresa Stanek Rea, Deputy Director of the U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:46 pm
The U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:46 pm
The U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 4:25 am
Senate and U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
But Ecuador is internationally responsible for its judiciary, so I don’t see the force of her point as a matter of international law. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:14 am
This is the latest in a series of opinions that makes clear that the federal judiciary is starting to take a different attitude towards internet-only child pornography cases; e.g., being very dubious of lifetime residency restrictions that essentially require the defendant to live in a rural area for the rest of his life.The only thing I'll add to the opinion is that the court might want to include an actual citation in footnote seven, which reads: "The California… [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
Morgan, 313 U.S. 409, 422 (1941) (mental processes of judge cannot be subjected to scrutiny; "[s]uch an examination of a judge would be destructive of judicial responsibility"); Grant v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm
This posting was written by Jeffrey May, Editor of CCH Trade Regulation Reporter.Bi-partisan legislation has been introduced in the U.S. [read post]
