Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 6801 - 6820 of 13,685
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Although he does not describe his racial background in the complaint, Diemert alleges the City classified him as white. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Does not the cause of working women need serious attention? [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 12:47 pm by emagraken
Moreover, the lower standard mandated by Rule 14-1(33) must also be exercised with restraint, as the Court reasoned at paras. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:53 am
Originally, it was used as a way to govern relations between nations, but now it is being utilized by human rights activists in order to hold corporations responsible for acts performed by their subsidiaries which infringe upon the rights of people in foreign nations in which the company resides. [1] The Act reads: “The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the… [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
Does such a requirement apply to 42 U.S.C. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:52 pm by MOTP
"[1] The jury found that the parties agreed the Nurses would receive a fixed amount of pay and that the Hospital breached the agreement. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
She does a job worth doing. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am by Patti Waller
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[27] Other unusual vehicles for E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks have included unpasteurized juices, yogurt, dried salami, mayonnaise, raw milk, game meats, sprouts, and raw cookie dough.[28] According  to  a  recent  study,  an  estimated  93,094  illnesses  are  due  to  domestically acquired E. coli O157:H7 each… [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Thus, the ground for opposition under A 100(a) does not prejudice the maintenance of the patent as granted. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:58 pm by Volker 'Falk' Metzler
Directive 2004/48/EC of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of IP rights (IPRED1). [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:14 pm by Ad Law Defense
August 29, 2016) (Dkt 18). [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 9:59 am
In its interpretation of EEA rules, the Court has consistently taken into account the relevant rulings of the ECJ given after the said date. ... this is "[w]ithout prejudice to future developments of case law".29 Neither Article 3(2) SCA nor Article 2(1) of Protocol 28 explicitly addresses the situation where the EFTA Court has ruled on an issue first and the ECJ has subsequently come to a different conclusion. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:46 am by Chris Castle
The “license availability date” is the January 1 following the second anniversary of the date the bill becomes law (assuming it ever does). [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
Atkinson’s third post without notifying him or warning him. 29. [read post]