Search for: "JOHN DOE, 2" Results 6801 - 6820 of 13,842
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2014, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
The court asked, “What does it mean to have ‘exclusive ownership’ in a sound recording ‘as against all persons’? [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 The Bransten v State of New York decisionIn September 2011 the New York State Department of Civil Service notified sitting judges that the State would reduce its contributions for health insurance premiums by 6% and reduce its contributions to retired judges' health insurance premiums by 2%. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 7:55 pm by Bill Otis
That is my superficial take on Holloway, but I would need to see all the papers to make an informed judgment.2. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 6:16 am by Jim Sedor
John Kitzhaber’s fiancée said she lived on a property in 1997 that was intended to be used for a marijuana growing operation. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relisted cases. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:59 am by Michael Beckett, Esq.
The case will likely be appealed considering Randa’s prior related decision to halt a John Doe investigation against the campaign of Gov. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm by Benjamin Bissell
Over at Foreign Policy, John Hudson reports that President Obama has yet another new critic: the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which has lambasted the US over the number of civilian deaths due to the coalition’s airstrikes. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 2:34 am by Beth Van Schaack
  Part 1 (overview) and 2 (deep history) are here and here, respectively. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:17 pm by NBlack
District Court judge for the Southern District of New York, John F. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
They will argue (1) that the Fourth Amendment does not protect our phone records; (2) that there are protections in place for our privacy; and (3) that the program is necessary for our national security. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:12 am by Michael Geist
The Netflix backlash (also found in Globe pieces from Kate Taylor and John Doyle) can be distilled down to two key concerns. [read post]