Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 6801 - 6820
of 13,583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2014, 11:33 am
Circuit (again with Judge Tatel writing) found not to be common carriage regulations a year ago in Cellco Partnership v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 10:18 am
§154(b)(1)(A)-(C). [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:22 am
R. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 7:38 am
In Lou v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court was sensitive to just this concern when it defined religion broadly for purposes of the conscientious objector statute governing military service in the 1965 case of United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:42 pm
Hammer v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:59 am
Mass. 2008).Agee v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
However, the employee’s claims under the Louisiana Employment Discrimination Law (LEDL) failed because one defendant was not her “employer,” the other did not have the requisite number of employees, and companies are not combined as joint employers under the LEDL the way they might be under Title VII (Stewart v Modern American Recycling Services, Inc, January 8, 2014, Barbier, C). [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:51 am
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:00 am
By Sarah Burstein, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Oklahoma College of Law Pacific Coast Marine Windshields, Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:10 am
Finding that a webpage containing the text of an arbitration agreement was enforceable, and that an AT&T employee who received notice of the agreement by email agreed to it when he accessed the webpage but did not opt-out by the deadline stated therein, a federal district court in Missouri granted AT&T’s motion to compel arbitration of his discrimination claims (Karzon v AT&T, Inc dba Southwestern Bell Telephone Co, Inc, January 7, 2014, Jackson, C). [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:59 am
§1332(c)(1), a corporation is deemed a citizen of “every State and foreign state” in which it is incorporated and the “State or foreign state” where it has its principal place of business. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:03 am
Guzzo v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:15 pm
Fortunately, in People v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 11:35 am
One month later, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 10:56 am
On December 24, 2013, in Commonwealth v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
State Air Resources Board (2013) 218 Cal.App.4th. 681. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
R. [read post]
