Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 6821 - 6840 of 13,885
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2024, 10:24 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Sentiments like these no doubt contributed to the Trump administrations efforts to terminate TPS designations for Haiti, Sudan, Nicaragua, and El Salvador, a decision that was challenged by TPS beneficiaries and their U.S. citizen children in federal court in Ramos v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 10:40 am by Employment Services
On September 19, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Casias v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:27 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
That dubious point was rebutted well enough at the hearings by EFF-Austin board member Matt Henry (see his column in the Houston Chronicle) who compared the situation to US v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
In 2015, the Canadian Centre for Court Technology published a discussion paper titled The Use of Social Media by Canadian Judicial Officers. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 11:50 am by Kevin Smith
  And until at least the mid-1990s, the Patent Office and the courts would not recognize patents for business methods. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am by John Elwood
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 17-567 Issue: Whether the administrative law judges of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation are inferior officers under the appointments clause, U.S. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:09 am by PaulKostro
My Law Office is located at 726 West Saint Georges [W. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The Fifth Circuit—after consulting the Supreme Court's "delphic" ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:48 pm
A University of Pennsylvania police officer with razor bumps who was disciplined for growing a beard in violation of policy has an ongoing racial discrimination lawsuit in federal court. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 4:32 am by Ray Mullman
The facility administrator called Wright-Gore into his office and told her she was being fired for taking photos of co-workers “without their permission. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:38 pm by Bill Marler
In describing the distinction between “interpretive rules” and rules requiring notice-and-comment (“substantive rules”), courts have stated that “`substantive rules … are those which create law, usually implementary to an existing law; whereas interpretative rules are statements as to what the administrative officer thinks the statute or regulation means. [read post]