Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 13,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2023, 6:56 am
ShareThe Supreme Court on Wednesday morning agreed to review a ruling by a federal appeals court that would significantly restrict (but not eliminate altogether) access to a drug used in medication abortions, which account for over half of all abortions performed in the United States. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:47 am
United States “will test whether the Court will keep its word that original writs of habeas corpus are a real backstop for AEDPA’s restrictions on postconviction review. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:49 pm
It resulted in a 2008 Supreme Court decision—Munaf v. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 5:58 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 10:36 am
(OFCCP v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
If, however, the Federal Government is the alleged patent infringer, the patent owner must sue the Government in the United States Court of Federal Claims and may recover only “reasonable and entire compensation” for the unauthorized use. 28 U. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:14 am
United States v Harper, Department of Revenue of Montana v Kurth Ranch, Cordero v Lalor, and United States v Ursery settled that a sanction in a "civil" or non-criminal proceeding may constitute punishment for double jeopardy purposes. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:09 am
Inducement to Infringe - In light of the Supreme Court of the United States' decision in Global-Tech v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Paxton (vacating stay), United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:55 am
Zillow Cert. petition). [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:04 am
On December 22, 2011, the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) issued a 3-2 en banc decision that limits the application of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) outside of the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 1:17 am
United States U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
United States, 11-799; Vance v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:16 am
Part 3 of my paper on the existing Indian family exception to ICWA.Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:32 am
Romeril v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:49 pm
National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:32 am
Romeril v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:33 am
The CAFC finds no judicial estoppel: Prior to claim construction, and alongside an ongoing inter partes review (“IPR”) proceeding, Egenera separately petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) to remove one of the eleven listed inventors from the ’430 patent. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 4:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
United States, 601 U.S. ____ (2024), the U.S. [read post]
