Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 55,733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
The purpose of the moratorium statute was to tie retiree benefits to active employee benefits so that retirees could benefit from the collective bargaining power of the active employees. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
The purpose of the moratorium statute was to tie retiree benefits to active employee benefits so that retirees could benefit from the collective bargaining power of the active employees. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
The purpose of the moratorium statute was to tie retiree benefits to active employee benefits so that retirees could benefit from the collective bargaining power of the active employees. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
The purpose of the moratorium statute was to tie retiree benefits to active employee benefits so that retirees could benefit from the collective bargaining power of the active employees. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 3:26 pm
" Dacey v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 2:38 pm
Power & Light, Co., 205 F.3d 1301 (11th Cir. 2000). [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:44 am
Supreme Court cases: Lucia v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
Attorney General (a/k/a NetChoice v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:40 am
Korematsu v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 6:59 am
In this post, Neal Chandru, an associate in the Tax team at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in DCM (Optical Holdings) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2020] CSIH 60. [read post]
25 May 2022, 2:26 am
It did this under the power conferred by Rule 104(2) of the Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules 2015 which states that the CAT may “make any order it thinks fit in relation to the payment of costs”. [read post]
24 May 2022, 9:05 pm
Davis and his coauthors situate their argument for antiracist antitrust law in the context of Cung Le v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 9:01 pm
In Cochran v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 2:43 pm
From Cawthorn v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 11:05 am
”] From Harrington v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:29 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 5:01 am
Moreover, instead of the more flexible standard of “relevance” to the investigation, the government must also provide specific and articulable facts giving reason to believe that the person to whom the records pertain is either a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power. [read post]
24 May 2022, 5:01 am
Moreover, instead of the more flexible standard of “relevance” to the investigation, the government must also provide specific and articulable facts giving reason to believe that the person to whom the records pertain is either a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:00 am
For example, I previously quoted Professor Solum himself for the following proposition shared by most New Originalists: [I]n Bradwell v. [read post]
