Search for: "Short v. United States"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 10,141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
(I'll leave for another day her implicit claim that the United States Supreme Court should grant certiorari in this case and overrule X.)But Justice Liu is also correct. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
United States, doesn’t have an appeals court decision yet. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:53 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:22 am
United States, 346 F.3d 386, 388 (3d Cir. 2003). [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
Espinoza v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 3:56 am
That's what Shelby County Circuit Judge Hub Harrington found in Burdette v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:04 pm
Unsurprisingly, and with a concise ruling, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York City cut short the reviews of an arbitral award the government of Laos sought to challenge in the matter Thai-Lao Lignite v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 12:02 pm
He has written and joined decisions that greatly enraged the “traditional liberal legal elites,” such as Citizens United and and Parents Involved v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:18 am
For these reasons, the Court concluded that the Luedtkes abandoned any residence they had in the United States and, at the time Heidi brought the children to the United States, their habitual residence was Switzerland. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 am
S196568, and Wisdom v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
Raw Text of Opinion UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MACKLE VINCENT SHELTON, Petitioner, v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:58 am
The following contribution to our Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:35 pm
" United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:29 pm
The ruling may not have any immediate impact, as Big Cypress already closed all units to ORV use for 60 days, starting June 4. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:14 pm
Their brand is not affiliated with the worldwide famous brand marketed by Philip Morris in the United States and many other countries. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:15 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:40 am
Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), the CFAA does not encompass Jacob's misappropriation of information that he lawfully accessed while working for plaintiffs or misuse of work computers in violation of their computer policies (see United States v Nosal, 676 F3d 854 [9th Cir. 2012]; see also University Sports Publs. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:43 pm
Well, the United States Supreme Court’s 2011 Term has come to an end. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:50 am
When the case came before the Supreme Court it turned on two short points of construction. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
In In O’Halloran v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 21 the European Court of Human Rights held that a provision of the Road Traffic Act 1988, which required vehicle owners to identify the driver, did not involve an infringement of Article 6, even if the identification led to a prosecution. [read post]
