Search for: "State v. Billings"
Results 6821 - 6840
of 19,726
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2022, 6:06 am
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637 [2018], affd 35 NY3d 173 [2020]). [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 5:37 pm
The court cited FDA v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Maine Governor Janet Mills signed a bill to protect abortion and gender-affirming health care providers and their out-of-state patients from legal action initiated by other states. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:06 am
Here, plaintiff has presented evidence of a “continuing wrong,” which is “deemed to have accrued on the date of the last wrongful act” (Leonhard v United States, 633 F2d 599, 613 [2d Cir. 1980], cert denied 451 US 908 [1981]; Harvey, 34 AD3d at 364). [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 3:42 am
Last year, in Hyle v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 2:45 pm
Other parts of the Bill of Rights similarly protect long-established rights, and they have not been applied to the states by the Supreme Court, the panel noted. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:31 pm
One might have thought that the Court went out of its way to avoid finding that the primary purpose of the DNA collection at issue is “to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing,” (Indianapolis v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 6:07 am
"Local attorney Bill Groth, who represents the plaintiffs in the Indiana case, has an article on the status of the Crawford v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:59 am
V. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 5:16 pm
Yellen v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm
Helfer v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:49 pm
Last week we told you that the Minnesota Supreme Court accepted review of State of Minnesota v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:49 pm
Last week we told you that the Minnesota Supreme Court accepted review of State of Minnesota v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 12:32 am
Last Act: 02/23/10 REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCES6902 VALESKY -- Requires the removal or covering of inapplicable highway work zone traffic control signs No Same asBLURB : V & T L. removal work zone signs Last Act: 02/23/10 REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATIONLast Action Date: 02/24/10(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Gonzales v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:31 pm
" See, Gardner v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 12:15 am
See Zauderer v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 12:43 pm
the Hart and Keller v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 11:14 am
In the unpublished opinion State of Arizona v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:19 pm
And what better way to top things off, than with a quick update in United States v. [read post]
