Search for: "State v. F. T."
Results 6821 - 6840
of 18,410
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2016, 4:42 am
” At Constitution Daily, Lyle Denniston highlights the pending cert. petition in Endrew F. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm
Lishman (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 1288), or a more deferential “substantial evidence” standard of review (as held by Mani Brothers Real Estate Group v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 9:16 am
LoggerHead Tools, LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:45 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 6:00 am
Objecting to producing certain documents demanded pursuant to a non-judicial subpoena duces tecumNew York State Joint Commission. on Public Ethics v Campaign for One N.Y., Inc., 2016 NY Slip Op 26290, Supreme Court, Albany County, Denise A. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 11:15 am
College. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 9:41 pm
The attorneys for Georgia are William T. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:02 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 10:49 am
In People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 10:49 am
In People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:16 am
Yes, but it can't because the Court of Appeals has already resolved this issue. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:10 am
State v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:10 am
State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 7:31 pm
27(f) of the University Act. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:00 am
Second, RFRA, which applies to federal action, and RLUIPA, which is applicable to state action, arise from different principles.,,, [T]he portion of RFRA that authorizes lawsuits against the states was held unconstitutional because such an application exceeded Congress's power under the Enforcement Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment in City of Boerne v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 1:52 pm
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm
Ingram, 412 F. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:00 am
You don’t need to reread that last sentence. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]