Search for: "A. P. G."
Results 6841 - 6860
of 8,741
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2010, 10:00 am
Turney P. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 8:00 am
According to ISS data, approximately 70 percent of the S&P 500 (as compared to approximately 37 percent of the S&P 1500) have a majority voting standard. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 7:50 am
De ce dossier, je retiendrais quelques pépites que je vous livre : « M. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 3:40 am
The P&G agreement seems different to the other sponsors in the sense that P&G will have to decide which of their product brands--e.g., Pampers diapers or Gillette shavers--will be featured. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:59 pm
[and] [p]roportionality review” State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:00 am
-Michael G. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:10 pm
Elle pourra alternativement saisir le juge pénal. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 11:21 am
The IRS accordingly levied extra taxes on P&G based on the $722 million. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
Here is the actual text of Arizona Senate Bill 1108 that authorizes people over age 20 to carry a concealed weapon in Arizona without a permit. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:49 am
P. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 2:14 pm
Baudouin, directeur général du groupe a indiqué au Figaro qu'il «interviendrait avant le 30 juin 2010». [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 2:01 am
(Rép. min. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:30 am
Thus, Black found that the credit for the Korean tax must be reduced by the amount for which P&G already was allowed a foreign tax credit for tax paid to Japan on the same income. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 9:41 am
JAMES P. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 10:27 am
[5] Gosfield, Stark III, p. 27. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 8:26 pm
LEXIS 191 (Mo 7/16/2010) Relief deneid on claims that: (A) the trial court erred “because it instructed the jury to consider evidence as to both counts in deciding the punishment for each individual count and, therefore, ‘allowed the jury to sentence [him] to death on each count based on evidence applicable to the other count’;” (B) instructions regarding “the “weighing step,” specifically, “the instructions improperly failed to require the state… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 5:40 am
p, hepimiz ad? [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 6:57 am
(Rép. min. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am
(b) The filing of a petition under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or of an application under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, does not operate as a stay—(1) under subsection (a) of this section, of the commencement or continuation of a criminal action or proceeding against the debtor;(2) under subsection (a)—(A) of the commencement or continuation of a civil action or proceeding—(i) for the establishment of paternity;(ii) for the… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:25 am
However, the Court of Appeal considered that the MCA “effectively plugged the Bournewood gap” (Sir Nicholas Wall P at paragraph 25). [read post]
