Search for: "Does 1 through 12" Results 6841 - 6860 of 15,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2019, 12:33 pm by Andrew Patterson
The decision prevents the government from implementing or expanding the policy, effective Friday, April 12. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm by WIMS
Jobs Gained, Jobs Lost by the Construction of Keystone XL, provides an in-depth look at the numbers and the uncertainty surrounding many of estimates [See WIMS 1/6/12]. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 8:05 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
New limitations on designs rights (Art. 18(1) Draft Directive, Art. 20(1) Design Regulation). [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
;  does the term “revolution” needs additional descriptors and sub-categories to be useful for purposes of typology (Silverstein)? [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:03 am by Kal Raustiala
A 2013 article describes the process in more detail: "I hit the pause button roughly one-third of the way through the first episode of "House of Cards," the political drama premiering on Netflix Feb. 1. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 7:33 am by Debra A. McCurdy
Notification: FDA proposes that the Agency will collect information regarding LDTs currently being used by laboratories through a notification process. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:51 pm
 However, that does not mean to say all is well and resolved in the non-patent IP world. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
In relation to Nike Intl’s EP 1 571 938 "footwear incorporating a textile with fusible filaments and fibers" the German Federal Patent Court had previously declared that all claims invalid for lack of inventive step starting from the German published examined application ("Auslegeschrift") DE 1 085 173 of 1954 in combination with US 2,440,393 of 1948. [read post]
’” The categories of information the Court identified include: “(1) incidentally acquired communications of or concerning a United States person that are clearly not relevant to the authoriz [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 3:12 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In order to establish their rights as distributees, the claimants, in a kinship proceeding, must prove: 1) their relationship to the decedent; 2) the absence of any person with a closer degree of consanguinity to the decedent; and 3) the number of persons having the same degree of consanguinity to the decedent or to the common ancestor through which they take. [read post]