Search for: "Fail v. State"
Results 6841 - 6860
of 66,290
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2015, 7:40 am
State, 2015 Tex. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm
The EPA has violated the Clean Air Act and undermined public health by failing to determine whether areas in five western states are complying with existing air-pollution standards and by failing to ensure that states are implementing legally required plans to meet the standards. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:35 am
Kansas don’t need no stinkin’ rule, and in Kahler v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:20 am
United States Second Circuit, 08/02/2010 US v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 9:22 am
The court also says that Beyond failed to demonstrate any adverse impact, and thus it fails to satisfy the injury requirement of both state and federal standing rules. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
ERF also fails to state a claim under RCRA because wood preservative that escapes from the utility poles is not a 'solid waste.' [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:23 am
Barry Rostholder et al. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:34 am
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 5:00 am
In what may be a case of first impression in Pennsylvania state court, Judge David J. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
And, while Young v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 4:53 pm
In Chaudhry v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 10:45 am
See, e.g., Mendes v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:22 am
ITC Limited v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 11:22 am
In three separate motions filed in Clark v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 2:37 pm
Citing NYNEX Corp v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
The standard the City urged for reviewing a facial challenge used language from United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 11:29 am
In AA Suncoast Chiropractic Clinic, PA v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:24 am
The tax, which is 24 times the state excise tax rate on beer, has received mixed reviews among constituents. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:50 am
When a party fails to abide by an interlocutory court order, there can be several consequences. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 6:24 pm
The post SCOTUS Update: Glossip v. [read post]
