Search for: "Fields v. A S" Results 6841 - 6860 of 17,272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2016, 6:39 am
" [para 59] The AG noted not only that such approach would be possibly against the principle of tax neutrality, but also recalled that "the Commission has recently published an action plan on VAT [of which yesterday's package is a follow-up] in which it specifically contemplates the alignment of the VAT rate applicable to digital books and newspapers with that applicable to printed books. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
This follows on from previous guidance on the instruction of experts in Medimmune v Novartis. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 9:50 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
A New Jersey court recently ruled in favor of a DWI defendant’s claim for this type of alleged injury in Landa v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
  While this may result in the payment of a claim under a lesser standard of scrutiny, it is important for members of the claim management team to understand how it works and rebut the presumption when evidence suggests non-work related factors were the real result of the condition or death from a heart condition. [1] Hopson v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 12:56 pm by Zachary Burdette, Quinta Jurecic
The Kremlin stated that 80,000 civilians who the insurgents kept as “human shields” now have access to Russian humanitarian supplies, including food and field hospitals. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:02 am by Adam Klein
 For example, his 2012 dissent in Lafler v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 4:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Court of Appeals’ November 18, 2016 decision in Excalibur Ventures LLC v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm by Ronald Collins
Is this owing to a relative paucity of female scholars in the business field, or is something else involved? [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
 This 48 chapter volume is a comprehensive guide to topics in the fields of epistemology and metaphysics of medicine. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 7:11 pm
That the plurality of opinions saw their decision as a temporary measure aimed at holding the field till Parliament’s involvement does not detract from the operation of the rule of stare decisis and the ratio decidendi upon which the decision is based, shall remain law under Article 141 of the Constitution. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 12:25 pm
That the plurality of opinions saw their decision as a temporary measure aimed at holding the field till Parliament’s involvement does not detract from the operation of the rule of stare decisis and the ratio decidendi upon which the decision is based, shall remain law under Article 141 of the Constitution. [read post]