Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 6841 - 6860 of 55,733
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Legal rights are therefore ephemeral, as we know from the likely imminent demise of Roe v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 7:07 pm by Guest Author
The Fifth Circuit’s recent decision invalidating tenure protections for SEC Administrative Law Judges (“ALJs”) in Jarkesy v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:56 am by Ananya Mukherjee
It provides a safe harbour to individuals without decision making powers in the military chain of command. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
That was the clear message of the Court’s recent decision in Bostock v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am by Dan Lopez
Antitrust Matters provides engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:21 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Gries, Michael Kranzlein, Nathan Schneider, Brian Slocum, and Kevin Tobia In Health Freedom Defense Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am by Gabriel Schoenfeld
” Dreher has in mind contemporary progressivism: “Under the guise of ‘diversity,’ ‘inclusivity,’ ‘equity,’ and other egalitarian jargon, the Left creates powerful mechanisms for controlling thought and discourse and marginalizing dissenters as evil. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am by David Bilinsky
On May 12, 2022 the British Columbia Court of Appeal issued reasons in the case of: Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 17 May 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v Granath [2022] EWHC 1181 (QB) by Lewis J. [read post]
22 May 2022, 9:41 am by Eugene Volokh
The Court also mentioned Congress's power to provide for the military, so some have argued that Rumsfeld is so limited as well. [read post]
21 May 2022, 7:32 pm by Howard Friedman
Cordileone formally notified Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives, of the consequences under Church law of her support for codifying Roe v. [read post]