Search for: "State v. Congress" Results 6841 - 6860 of 29,295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2013, 1:24 pm by WIMS
      The Appeals Court says, "Because Congress omitted any reference to 'comparable' state standards in § 1365, and because § 1365(b)(1)(B) specifically refers to an action 'to require compliance with the standard, limitation, or order' that is the subject of the citizen suit, we hold that its bar applies only if the government's action seeks to do exactly that. . . [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 10:24 am
Those who experienced the joy of Judge F's final exam in Federal Courts last Fall were doubtless familiar with one of the questions answered by the Supreme Court in Mass. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 5:23 am by SHG
Already the 115th Congress has been hard at work. [read post]
Military detention may be legitimate for those captured on an actual battlefield, as our supreme court recognised in Hamdi v Rumsfeld. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:20 am by Meredith Ervine
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama granted summary judgment to the NSBA in National Small Business United v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:24 am by Tejinder Singh
Today in the Community we are discussing United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 9:56 am
That means ICJ rulings don't supersede state law unless Congress specifically requires it. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
The Court stated, “Specifically, we find unconstitutional all of the language in 17 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
The Court stated, “Specifically, we find unconstitutional all of the language in 17 U.S.C. [read post]