Search for: "State v. Record"
Results 6841 - 6860
of 43,394
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2007, 9:34 am
US v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 7:35 pm
A conversation about Kelo v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 12:02 pm
Ohio’s legislature is considering an abortion “trigger bill” which would immediately outlaw abortion in the state if the United States Supreme Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 2:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 8:33 am
The case is Cuomo v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:51 pm
In July 2019, the Utah Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Rocky Ford Irrigation Company v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:45 am
& Michelle Rupe Eubanks v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 6:54 am
Nevertheless, the case presents a compelling question of statutory interpretation, and has the potential to affect thousands of noncitizens with criminal records who face removal from the United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 11:53 am
Maryland and United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 9:44 am
Briggs v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:39 am
However, the Supreme Court is currently set to hear argument soon on another prominent case concerning Public Records Act disclosure of peace officer names in Long Beach Police Officers Association v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:39 am
The agreement was recorded in a bill of lading which stated it incorporated all the terms of the relevant charterparty. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:32 am
By John Ottaviani Buckles Management, LLC v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 11:52 am
., ch. 11), and that State Bar v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:40 am
On this record, the State has failed to meet its burden of establishing a substantial special need to drug test all TANF applicants without any suspicion. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 3:05 am
Case Name: Bustos v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 8:32 pm
State records indicate the Auriga, a fiberglass Beck built in 1980, belongs to Thomas Lopez. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 9:25 am
From the order:Because the record in this case contains extensive material marked as confidential, the court has issued its opinion dated August 1, 2017 under seal. [read post]
