Search for: "Green v. Green"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 8,872
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2022, 5:00 am
The action reflects a focus by the SEC’s Climate and ESG Task Force on misrepresentation of “green” credentials. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
While the bill’s authors may have had in mind those who first arrive in the United States on parole, however, the language of the bill is broad enough to cover those who use advance parole to leave and re-enter the United States while they have a pending application for an immigration benefit, most commonly an application for adjustment of status to that of a Lawful Permanent Resident (green card holder). [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 4:00 am
The leading case is Train v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
A little over a year ago we left Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Société Elmar Wolf – reported here in the IPKat – and the Court of Justice making it clear to the General Court that 'what it said explicitly was what it meant'. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
The Supreme Court warned in McCreary County v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 12:40 am
In its much awaited judgment in the Delhi University photocopying case (The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:30 am
Judge Paul V. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:07 am
Work 2 v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Learn more about the plaintiffs in Alasaad v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 4:08 am
Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 1:37 pm
"In my previous post I wrote I had also interpreted the Ninth Circuit's Jones v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:22 pm
Unresolved in 2013, the FTC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 12:44 pm
We had the opportunity to talk about how the Free Software Foundation is one of the 22 plaintiffs in our First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 2:35 pm
It may remain stored, but not indexed; No judicial review of the justification for the surveillance; No notification to individuals incidentally or mistakenly monitored; Very difficult to impose consequences for violating the FAA, see e.g. government’s argument in Amnesty v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:06 am
State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 8:05 am
Brady v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 4:45 am
"Reasonable suspicion" is not required under Texas law except for physical mobile tracking devices like those at issue in US v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 10:24 am
Related Cases: Williams v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 9:34 am
Vitamins Online, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
The Board noted that Qualitex (green press pad) and Owens-Corning (pink insulation) involved a single color applied to a product. [read post]
