Search for: "MATTER OF T F" Results 6861 - 6880 of 13,545
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2014, 12:29 am by Steve Baird
The matter of controversy is registration, and in the second proceeding, it’s infringement. . . . [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 3:14 am by Broc Romanek
” Also don’t forget my podcast with Mike Garland of the Office of New York City Comptroller about the 75 access proposals that his office has sent to companies… Not that it matters, but note that Corp Fin’s response to Whole Foods – dated December 1st – is not yet posted on the SEC’s site. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:52 am by Jeff Welty
” Unlike some statutory amendments, the date of the offense doesn’t matter – as long as the arraignment takes place on or after December 1, the option to waive is available to the defendant. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:21 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
AVI Casino Enters., Inc. 548 F.3d 718, 725 (9th Cir. 2008) (“[T]ribal corporations acting as an arm of the tribe enjoy the same sovereign immunity granted to a tribe itself. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 5:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
As such, “[i]f there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:31 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
It doesn’t matter, he told me, how Congress resolves the issue, so long as they resolve it. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 2:52 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Based on its premises that “[t]he Executive Order underpins all of the state’s current efforts to reduce [GHG] emissions” and that its “overarching goal of ongoing emissions reductions” was “validated and ratified” by AB 32, the majority held “SANDAG’s decision to omit an analysis of the transportation plan’s consistency with the Executive Order did not reflect a reasonable, good faith effort at full disclosure and is… [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 10:19 am
Colgate Palmolive Co., ___ F.3d ___, 2014 WL 6661086 (4th Cir. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 3:32 pm by Schachtman
., ___ F.3d ___, 2014 FED App. 0258P, 2014 U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
At the material time Matúz was also the chairman of the Trade Union of Public Service Broadcasters (Közszolgálati Műsorkészítők Szakszervezete). [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:01 pm
Consequently, the trade mark "ECR-Award" disagreed with the DPMA and T was not lacking distinctiveness for the services covered in class 41 and disagreed with the differing assessment by the DPMA and the German Federal Patent Court, which had both had done exactly that - found that the mark ECR-Award was lacking distinctiveness for the services covered in class 41.Merpel cannot help but feel for the Examiners. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:04 am
 The Grand Jury Did Something That Grand Juries Ordinarily Don’t Do. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:38 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The editorial board of the New York Times can't help themselves. [read post]