Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 6861 - 6880 of 13,843
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-10639, asking whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with retroactivity rules when new precedent changes the law after briefing. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:16 am by Amy Howe
 Testifying on behalf of the Judicial Conference of the United States, which makes policy for the federal courts (but does not speak for the Supreme Court), U.S. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 2:37 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
In summary, no serious accidents have yet occurred in the United States as a result of a drone interfering with manned aircraft operations. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 12:48 pm
 But shortly thereafter, the United States Supreme Court decided Maryland v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am by Ron Coleman
  And a federal court has recently agreed, because on April 10, 2014, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that A’lor is barred from infringing CHARRIOL cable trademarks by selling ALOR jewelry that uses such cable. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:52 pm
Sept. 16, 2014).IssueBoston Scientific Corporation and Scimed Life Systems, Inc. petition for permission to appeal an order of the United States District Court for the Central District of California that denied summary judgment. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:10 pm
On November 25, 2014, the United States Northern District Court of California granted our client’s motion for judgment and denied the Defendants’ motion for judgment. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:38 am by Jim Singer
Following on the heels of a recent, similar decision from United States District Court for the Central District of California, the Court of Appeals of the State of New York held that a license granted to an entity and its “affiliates” is limited to affiliates that were in existence on the effective date of the license agreement, unless the agreement expressly states otherwise. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm
Hulu, LLC et al., a patent attorney for Ultramercial, Inc. and Ultramercial, LLC appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit asserting that the District Court for the Central District of California erred in granting Defendant Wildtangent, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:44 am
            This is the official week in the United States for giving thanks. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:27 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California recently denied class certification in a case alleging wrongdoing by a loan servicer in connection with the Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”). [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:38 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The blame lies squarely with the United States Supreme Court in the 1970s and its propensity at that time to make up rights that are not really in the Constitution.In Faretta v. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 12:36 pm by Gene Quinn
On November 19, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in e.Digital Corporation v. [read post]