Search for: "State v. E. E. B." Results 6861 - 6880 of 10,086
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Accord University of South Alabama v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 8:59 pm by Kathleen L. Ford
  The plaintiff appealed.On appeal, the plaintiff argued that § 1681t(b)(1)(F) conflicts with 1681h(e) because, according to the plaintiff, 1681h(e) specifically authorizes certain state law claims while §1681t(b)(1)(F) preempts them. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:47 am by WSLL
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; Meri V. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm by Blogspot
Nothing in this article shall be invoked to delay or to prevent the abolition of capital punishment by any State Party to the present Covenant. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
Since both the United States and India are federations, invariably the Superior Courts in those jurisdictions are called on to decide when there appears to be any conflict between state and federal legislation or a question of legislative competence arises. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 11:59 am by Katherine Gallo
§2031.240(b) does specifically not state the kind of identification that is required, it is expected that for each document withheld that the privilege log state (a) the nature of the document (e.g., letter, memorandum, (b) date, (c) author, (d) recipients, (e) the sequential number (or document control umber, if any), and (f) the privilege claimed. [read post]