Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 28,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
Thus, in R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence [2006] 1 WLR 3213 para 165 provides that in discrimination cases there should be a structured approach to the question of justification: “First, is the objective sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right? [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 7:56 pm
Alas, these progressive convention supporters fail to explain why we should expect a convention would yield anything positive in light of state laws that would give ALEC full control of 29 state delegations. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:10 am
Brown states that the same video was downloaded twice -- one into a shared file and the other into an incomplete file, even though the video was fully downloaded and not incomplete. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:59 pm
by Dennis Crouch The USPTO has published new examination guidelines regarding the enablement requirement for utility patent applications in light of the Supreme Court’s May 2023 decision in Amgen v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:06 am
For this additional reason, the Monroe County Court of Common Pleas denied the Defendant’s request to hold up the settlement in light of the Medicare issues presented in the Dailey-Console v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 5:42 am
Medtronic and Levine v. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 4:09 pm
On 4 February 2021, the Constitutional Court handed down its decision in the case of AmaBhungane Centre for Investigative Journalism NPC v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services [2021] ZACC 3. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
The question is whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, "a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
The question is whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, "a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:40 am
The record establishes, as a matter of law, that defendants did not have time to pre-clear the consent agreement between plaintiff and New York State Office of Professional Medical Conduct (OMPC) with the New York State Office of Medicaid Inspector General (OMIG). [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 9:20 pm
Massachusetts: Because Grant preserved his confrontation right under Code § 19.2-187.1, we express no opinion on whether Code § 19.2-187.1 continues to remain a constitutionally valid notice and demand statute in light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 5:20 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 3:47 pm
State, 539 U.S. 510 (2003) and Rompilla v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 5:21 pm
Should be interesting to watch.]State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 8:18 am
Light Prods., Inc., 523 F.3d1353, 1361 (Fed. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:50 pm
In Fish v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 1:44 pm
In Faulkinbury v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
United States, 135 S. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:45 pm
” However, in light of Mathis v. [read post]
