Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 6881 - 6900
of 120,415
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm
According to the solicitor general of the U.S. in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:36 am
Oakland Heritage Alliance v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:30 pm
Subscribers may read on here. [read post]
10 May 2013, 3:32 pm
Parol Evidence Rule Parol evidence may not be used to vary or contradict the express or implied terms of an unambiguous written agreement absent a showing of fraud, accident, or mutual mistake. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
Although an administrator may have certain powers to administer a statute, he or she lacks authority to supplement or amend duly enacted legislationHazan v WTC Volunteer Fund, 2014 NY Slip Op 04103, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentA former emergency medical technician [EMT] went to World Trade Center site to offer assistance in the rescue and recovery efforts on September 11, 2001. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 11:17 am
Neri v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 8:55 pm
The PRA has amended SS31/15 to clarify that firms may use shocks determined by a third party where those shocks are consistent with the Basel Committee standard. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 11:39 am
Using a number of examples of artists who collaborate with nature, the article explains how natural forces can disturb authorship, but may not defeat it. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 11:39 am
Using a number of examples of artists who collaborate with nature, the article explains how natural forces can disturb authorship, but may not defeat it. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 9:19 am
Fagas v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Conventional fair use may require only a single test to determine fairness, but the Canadian fair dealing/fair use hybrid comes close by ensuring that virtually all uses will meet the purposes standard and proceed to the second-stage, six-factor analysis described above. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 5:40 pm
Most Popular Federal Law Article Supreme Court Rules That Plaintiffs May Use Section 1981 to Sue for Retaliation. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 6:03 am
THe code allows a licensee to elect to continue to use licensed IP rights even if the debtor-licensor attempted to reject the license. 11 U.S.C. 365(n) (licensee of “a right to intellectual property . . . may elect . . . to retain its rights”). [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:21 pm
Kirk v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 3:46 pm
As Kevin LaCroix notes, the Delaware Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of fee shifting bylaws: In a May 9, 2014 opinion (here), the Court held in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:22 pm
Antrim Truck Centre Ltd v Ontario (Minister Of Transportation)" (2011) 90 Can Bar Rev 215. [read post]
Import of Gallagher v. Geico Household Exclusion Decision Reviewed by Eastern Federal District Court
21 Jul 2020, 5:35 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:33 pm
May 9: In the U.S. [read post]
11 May 2011, 1:33 pm
May 9: In the U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 7:08 am
The Result of Procopio v. [read post]
