Search for: "P. T.2" Results 6881 - 6900 of 14,921
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2024, 7:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
GCU isn’t permitted to contract with any third party for these services. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 8:33 am by Dave
I don’t repeat them here as they are long but scroll down to page 48-9 and 51-2. [read post]
6 May 2007, 12:09 am
The governor isn't mentioned anywhere at all in the Sheriffs grants (see p. 149-153).What's going on here? [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Legal Post Blog 2. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
 2 b) de la Loi sur le Barreau). [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 7:15 am by Patricia Hughes
He hoped to “prepar[e] [the students] for their future endeavours as lawyers, advocates, and activists” (Report, p.14); one thing he didn’t do to help prepare them, though, was to learn how to be accountable for their actions. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 8:06 am by Jacobs Paul
As the United States Supreme Court explained in a somewhatanalogous context in Alamo Foundation, supra, 471 U.S. at page 302, with respectto the federal wage and hour law: “[T]he purposes of the [FLSA] require that it beapplied even to those who would decline its protections. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:37 pm by José Guillermo
 OBSERVACIONES: CUALQUIER CONSULTA COMUNIQUESE UD DIRECTAMENTE AL CORREO: rocornejodj@mpfn.gob.pe o al celular 997728381HACE EXACTAMENTE VEINTIDOS DÍAS se admitió mi DENUNCIA, me proporcionaron un número equivocado, HOY LA ASISTENTE DE LA FISCAL A LA QUE DENUNCIO POR ESTA VÍA A FALTA DE UN ÓRGANO DE CONTROL INTERNO EN URUBAMBA, ME INFORMÓ QUE LA DENUNCIA TIENE POR NÚMERO 572-2021.El día de hoy la situación en el hogar de… [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 10:55 am by gA
 La Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos falló a favor de los demandantes, estableciendo que cuando Alabama fue admitido en la Unión, lo fue en un plano de igualdad con los estados originales en términos de soberanía sobre los lechos de los ríos navegables dentro de sus límites. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 11:47 am by Wetenkamp
  Whether this is a message directly opposing Obama or indirectly supporting Romney, it doesn’t matter. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
P. 23(a) and 23(b)); Giovanniello v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:13 am by David Zaring
When the SEC does pass a big new rule, one way to signal to the DC Circuit that it should be reversed is clearly to split 3-2 on adoption. [read post]