Search for: "P. T.2"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 14,921
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2014, 1:27 pm
Under the burden-shifting legal approach to monopolization claims laid out by the Microsoft courts, proof of exclusionary effects require a Section 2 defendant to come forward with a procompetitve rationale for the challenged practices. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 5:07 am
ISS has indicated that these scorecard factors and their relative weightings would be keyed to company size and status, with different weightings applicable to companies in the following categories: S&P 500, Russell 3000 (excluding the S&P500), Non-Russell 3000, and Recent IPOs or Bankruptcy Emergent companies. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
2. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 12:21 am
Aren’t these interactions negotiations? [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 7:25 am
., (Case No. 2:13-cv-00018, 2014 WL 4987972,October 7, 2014), Chief Judge Philip P. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:29 am
Bérard as a fraudfeasor[2]. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:59 am
Once an ambulance arrives, you will be in good hands. 2. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am
P&G: an example of the problem? [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
The Federation and the LänderArticle 20 [Constitutional principles – Right of resistance](1) The Federal Republic of Germany is a democratic and social federal state.(2) All state authority is derived from the people. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:10 am
But a simple rule that we will not hire 24 year olds with purple hair and piercing through their cheeks is almost certainly not prohibited by human rights legislation. 2. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
While article L. 113-2 of the French Intellectual Property (IP) Code defines “composite work” as a “work in which a pre-existing work is incorporated without the cooperation of the author of the latter,” article L. 113-4 merely states that such work “is the property of the author who made it, subject to the rights of the author of the original work” but not explain its rationale further. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc., 257 P.3d 1130, 1137-38 (2011) (emphasis original). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
GC: Ah, I don’t know the exact date. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:22 am
Hasn’t seen Titanic. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:11 am
La novedad se determina por la disponibilidad pública de diseños idénticos. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:01 pm
Although the Privacy Act doesn’t define a private communication, in State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:33 pm
Preemption gives force to the Supremacy Clause, and comes in three types: (1) express, (2) conflict, and (3) field preemption. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:50 am
’ Fed.R.Evid. 606(b)(2); see also Tanner v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 8:40 am
Can., 1993-08-12), SOQUIJ AZ-93111093, J.E. 93-1438, [1993] 2 R.C.S. 918). [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 4:44 am
About ten years ago, then-Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer allegedly (according to a court filing) said this:"F...ing Eric Schmidt is a f...ing p...y. [read post]
