Search for: "People v Denis"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 15,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
" And, this, of course, is how they suggest Brown v Board of Education can be justified on an originalist basis even if the expected application of the 14th Amendment as a whole by the people at the time was that it allowed segregated schools. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
Next is Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 1:20 pm
”); People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 8:12 pm
Previously, the New York Court of Appeals had affirmed a rejection of that claim (People v Ramchair, 8 NY3d 313, 316 [2007]) reasoning that appellate counsel's brief to the Appellate Division had been “comprehensive,” and the arguments raised therein “strong” (Id.). [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:05 pm
OTOH, the Court has denied the corporation some of the rights that natural persons possess. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 6:42 am
The Appellate Division, Second Department decision in Lapidus v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 7:30 am
He’s best known for Brown v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 4:17 am
Lee v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Pathologizing people’s justifiable anger at having no meaningful access to court is not useful. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:27 am
Shay asks whether more time should be put into teaching Brady, given the decision in Connick v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:49 am
When the court hears a second oral argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am
”); see also Sierra Club v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
At least 147 people were sickened and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 10:01 am
In Florida Star v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:53 pm
Plaintiff relied heavily on Krueger v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:23 am
Twitter had amended this policy in late October 2018 to specifically include targeted abuse and misgendering of transgender people. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
Thus second, the question the Court had to resolve – like in all cases where people claim to be denied equal protection or assert a violation of a right – is whether the government had an adequate justification for its actions. [read post]
