Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 6881 - 6900 of 71,795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2013, 8:33 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: ANTHONY DUANE WEST v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:04 am by WSLL
THE STATE OF WYOMINGDocket Number: S-12-0055URL: http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Opinions.aspxAppeal from the District Court of Crook County, Honorable Dan R. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg Law, Jordan Rubin reports that “Michael R. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 5:14 am
Jurisdictional classification, position classification and determining the compensation to be paid individuals in the States “civil service” DeMartino v City of New York, 2012 NY Slip Op 22178, Supreme Court, New York County The City of New York promulgated Personnel Orders No. 2012/1 and 2012/2 that approve and resulted in an amendment to Rule X of the Personnel Rules and Regulations of the City of New York. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:15 am
The Court's more recent 1991 ruling in McNeil v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:06 am by Adam Wagner
Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 – Read judgment The general rule in civil law cases is that the loser pays the winner’s legal costs, even if the case settles before trial. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:27 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Here's the abstract:Neben dem "Kampf gegen den Terror" zählt die Verhinderung von schweren Menschenrechtsverletzungen in innerstaatlichen Konflikten zu den bedeutendsten Problemen des Völkerrechts im ersten Jahrzehnt des 21. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:13 pm
The California Supreme Court set forth criteria for checkpoints to ensure they are in compliance with the Federal and California's State Constitution in Ingersoll v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 1:36 pm
Today, design patent law is in the weakest and most confused state since before the Supreme Court’s landmark 1871 decision of Gorham v. [read post]