Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 6881 - 6900 of 71,795
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm by Giles Peaker
In Hunter’s case, at p 695C, Lord Lloyd said that nuisances are of three kinds:“(1) nuisance by encroachment on a neighbour’s land, (2) nuisance by direct physical injury to a neighbour’s land; and (3) nuisance by interference with a neighbour’s quiet enjoyment of his land. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm by Giles Peaker
In Hunter’s case, at p 695C, Lord Lloyd said that nuisances are of three kinds:“(1) nuisance by encroachment on a neighbour’s land, (2) nuisance by direct physical injury to a neighbour’s land; and (3) nuisance by interference with a neighbour’s quiet enjoyment of his land. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 1:49 pm by Michael Froomkin
The panel was Judge R. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:45 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the appeals court affirmed the dismissal of a former marine’s Title VII claims against the Secretary of Navy alleging that toward the end of his military career, his supervising officers discriminated against him based on his race and sex (Jackson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:43 am by Joy Waltemath
The state high court concluded that the commission that would have been due to the employee under the employer’s true-up policy had she not been terminated was a “lost wage” that must be trebled under the Wage Act. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 7:43 am by Joy Waltemath
” Under either, the employee’s time is compensable, under the court’s 2000 holding in Morillion v. [read post]