Search for: "US v. Banks" Results 6881 - 6900 of 13,987
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2014, 6:04 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
 Two US Courts Permit Defendants To Be Served on FacebookBring your gun, get a discount: Louisiana restaurant’s promotion sparks criticismKnow the LSUC Rules of Professional Conduct: changes are comingCRTC to Netflix: Since you won't co-operate, we'll ignore you Sun Media apologizes to Justin Trudeau California enacts strict student privacy law Ruth Bader Ginsburg: If Roe v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
 On PatLit, Stefano Barazza's thoughtful post on the invalidation of a patent for lip and facial synchronisation of animated characters gives us an insight into life in the United States after Alice v CLS Bank revived the old-fashioned notion that patents are for inventive concepts and not for abstract ideas. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm by Malik W. Ahmad
The term includes compensation received by a judgment debtor that is in the possession of the judgment debtor, compensation held in accounts maintained in a bank or any other financial institution or, in the case of a receivable, compensation that is due the judgment debtor. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm by Malik W. Ahmad
The term includes compensation received by a judgment debtor that is in the possession of the judgment debtor, compensation held in accounts maintained in a bank or any other financial institution or, in the case of a receivable, compensation that is due the judgment debtor. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:13 pm by Noura Erakat
They are hopeful that this means, Israeli or US banks can be sued for facilitating the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:30 am by Gene Quinn
Since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 6:28 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Monday, September 22, 2014:Thanks Twitterland for helping us reach 2000 followers. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:50 pm
 The grant of privilege was not discretionary (Three Rivers District Council and Others v The Governor and Company of the Bank of England [2004] UKHL 48), and confidentiality in itself was not sufficient to render a communication privileged. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:30 pm by Cindy Cohn and rainey Reitman
  So why is the standard so much higher for engaging in torture or forced conversion than it would be for bank robbing or patent or copyright infringement? [read post]