Search for: "AMERICAN PRINCIPLES IN ACTION " Results 6901 - 6920 of 8,652
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 3:27 am by Sean Wajert
American Brands, Inc., 16 P.3d 435 (Nev. 2001); Paz v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:37 am by Rick Pildes
Congress’s solution was to change the default rule, so that the President’s actions become unlawful, and military force has to cease, unless Congress can overcome all these interests and collective action dynamics and authorize the President’s action. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:58 pm by Bexis
  We mentioned before that one of our objections to the Principles was that they sought to overrule Bridgestone/Firestone. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm by Barry Barnett
Bonus: The Court cited, for the first time, the American Law Institute's brand-new Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation (2010), in whose development Blawgletter played an astonishingly small role. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:24 am by Charles O'Mahony
Professor Stein’s session examined the core values, principles and general obligations contained in the Convention. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:30 am by Joanna Grossman
  Slightly later, some states moved to create quasi-marital, status-based rights for cohabitants, a shift endorsed by the American Law Institute’s Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:07 pm by Steve Bainbridge
But he insisted on what he called "the sound constitutional principle that sustained hostilities should be based on affirmative and specific congressional approval. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:47 am by Briggs Matheson - Guest
  In doing so, that court identified two principles underlying the exception. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm by WIMS
This action is being taken under a settlement agreement. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:41 pm by Lovechilde
In the process, the military has gained a kind of unspoken and distinctly un-American primacy. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 10:56 am by Celeste Blackburn
The business columnist of The New York Times and her coauthor exposes how the watchdogs who were supposed to protect the country from financial harm were actually complicit in the actions that finally blew up the American economy. 6. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am by Alexander Gibson
 Class actions have, throughout American history, served as the best way to litigate group rights. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm by Stephen Griffin
"Congress" was supposed to be consulted for its advice prior to any military action. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:24 am by Stefanie Levine
This is the “commonsense principle that … new evidence supporting an invalidity defense may ‘carry more weight’ in an infringement action than evidence previously considered by the PTO. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:23 am by Gilles Cuniberti
The more likely the foreign court is to recognize a U.S. class judgment, the more likely that an American court will include those foreigners in the U.S. class action. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:59 pm by INFORRM
  However, in most cases Canadian courts have achieved an appropriate result by applying a “real and substantial connection” test, based on principles of order, fairness and jurisdictional restraint that consider (1) the connection between the plaintiff’s claim (i.e., the substance of the action) and the jurisdiction, and (2) the connections between the defendant and the jurisdiction. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
"In principle, agencies may identify responsible food items in fewer outbreaks if the costs of doing so are rising or the benefits are falling. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:13 pm by James R. Marsh
What are some general principles of transparency that departments of human services can adopt? [read post]