Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 51,430
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2019, 12:52 pm
We offer a free initial consultation so that we can discuss your case with you. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
"The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that the County was under no contractual obligation to provide [Handy] with health insurance and, accordingly, it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in terminating that benefit.The Handy decision should be contrasted with two other retiree benefits cases: Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady.The Schenectady cases differed in that they concerned executive action as opposed to… [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 11:11 am
Page 1 2008 NY Slip Op 50318(U) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:53 am
People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 2:36 pm
In Lava v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 7:58 pm
State of Mississippi v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 1:30 pm
The Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 8:20 am
In State v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 3:54 am
People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Gay v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:02 pm
McLaughlin, but that case did not involve jail security. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 9:26 am
If you want another example, think of Jacobson v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:39 pm
In Coogan v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 4:44 am
Those cases are Dyson v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:23 am
Wetzel v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 1:46 pm
On July 3rd the ILB posted an entry that began: "The 7th Circuit heard oral arguments in the case of Hindrichs v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 5:34 am
Carpenter v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 1:49 pm
But that many people "could" be affected doesn't create a public benefit if there's no showing the many people actually are affected. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:52 pm
See People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:21 am
Supreme hears oral argument in Concepcion v. [read post]
