Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 9,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2011, 6:35 am
[T]he claim 1 term of “compounds of the formula AxBxOx” is amenable to two or more plausible claim constructions (i.e., one being open ended as argued by Appellants and one being closed-ended as presented by the Examiner), thereby justifying requiring Appellants to more precisely define the metes and bounds of the claimed invention by holding the claim unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 6:04 am
This is even true whether Inventor B is aware of Inventor A’s earlier application or not. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
In this context, therefore, the "proceeding" does not conclude until the appellate process has concluded. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm
The present subject-matter does not involve a selection of that kind in an area which, although marked out by the state of the art, is nonetheless virgin territory.[13] However, the disclosure by description in a cited document of the starting substance as well as the reaction process is always prejudicial to novelty because those data unalterably establish the end product. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:41 pm
Call today 1-800-596-1533 for a free consultation. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 12:22 pm
Holding Co., Inc., 35 Cal.4th 1159, 1185–1186 (2005).) [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
Because the Board erred in construing the means-plusfunction limitation of claims 11 and 21 and because there is no permissible construction, this court affirms the rejection of claims 11 and 21 on the alternative ground of failure to satisfy the definiteness requirement of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:38 am
However, the patent act requires that the actual scope of MPF claims be limited to structures disclosed within their specifications. 35 U.S.C. 112 p6. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 4:23 pm
Does the National Export Initiative (NEI) have any relevance in solving the economic dilemma? [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:07 pm
" 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:16 pm
Pol'y 1 (2010). [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:31 am
See 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 11:20 am
[1] Cheryl D. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:33 am
Article 27(1)(h) does place an obligation on State Parties to the Convention to “Promote the employment of persons with disabilities in the private sector through appropriate policies and measures” and in Article 27(1)(j) to promote the acquisition by persons with disabilities of work experience in the open labour market. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:58 am
Causation How does Mr. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
[1] In re Bernard L. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:47 pm
We conclude that it does not. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:46 pm
Of note: Much to the contrary, “a patent does have value beyond its expiration date.” [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:46 pm
Of note: Much to the contrary, “a patent does have value beyond its expiration date. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:08 pm
Hanke, 2007 SCC 7, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 333. [read post]
