Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 11,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
Shortly before Nollan was decided, in First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v County of Los Angeles, Justice Scalia joined the Court majority in ruling that under the Constitution’s “Just Compensation Clause,” a “temporary taking” denying a landowner of all use of his property entitles that landowner to compensation for the “temporary” loss of that use. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:39 pm
According to the Curia website we can look forward to the following attractions:* On Wednesday 11 July there's the hearing in Case T-181/05 Citigroup (formerly Citicorp) and Citibank v OHIM - Citi (CITI). [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 3:09 pm
In Henson v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:31 am
There appears to be only a single case from New York dealing with this issue, HH Cincinnati Textile L.P. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 3:35 am
We offered some tentative findings about the linguistic claims made by the majority and dissent in D.C. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
", considers the interaction between the specific jurisdictional rules regarding claims involving EU unitary IP rights and the jurisdictional rules under the Brussels regulation in light of the CJEU decisions in case C-617/15 (Hummel v Nike) and joined Cases C-24/16 and C-25/16 (Nintendo v BigBen Interactive) and the subsequent English court’s decision in Poul Chang Metal Industry Company Ltd v Bailcast Ltd and Anor.Book ReviewsSpecialKat Hayleigh… [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
” County of Sacramento v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 4:06 am
: English translation of Dutch Supreme Court decision in MSD v Teva highlights UK Supreme Court's Actavis decision I Student essays: how to write a good piece? [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 10:58 am
Huawei/Conversant v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
List, Guggenheim v. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 12:25 pm
| Applying the Actavis questions to numerical limitations: Regen Lab v Estar | Formstein defence in the UK? [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 10:37 am
When the Maryland attorneys were unavailable, the managing partner or another D.C. attorney met with the homeowners.The homeowners, mostly native Spanish-speakers who spoke little or no English, entered into retainer agreements with the law firm, paying up to $7,500 up front in exchange for negotiations with the lender to modify their loan, foreclosure defense, and possible litigation. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 5:51 am
In the recent UK decision Astellas v Teva [2023] EWHC 2571 (Pat) Mr Justice Mellor in the High Court considered sufficiency, inventive step and infringement of Astellas' formulation patent for mirabegron. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:55 pm
The fact that your client did not understand the English legal system in relation to being homeless is ignorance of the legal consequences and not ignorance of a relevant fact. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 12:23 pm
That runs us into a second case, Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:32 pm
Amant v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
Justice Rehnquist, giving the Majority Opinion in Adamo Wrecking Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:51 am
Jersey Media Grp., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
Juarez v. [read post]
