Search for: "English v. English"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 9,861
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2016, 12:30 am
While the Appellate Division ruled against her, its opinion in State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 7:11 am
Reagan v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:12 am
Recognition and proprietary consequences of a UK civil partnership in South Africa The decision in AC v CS 2011 2 SA 360... [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:49 am
" He likens it (if I understand his argument) to Justice Harlan's tradition-based methodology of due process in Poe v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 12:25 pm
J.A.W. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 7:00 am
The Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:25 pm
In the four-one-four ruling in Yates v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
In Rocha v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:44 am
., Obviousness Approaches of the EPO and The English Courts ), discussing Actavis v Novartis [2010] EWCA Civ 82, 17th February 2010 . [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 3:41 am
What that change will be wasn’t clear after the Justices heard arguments in the case of Christie v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 3:04 am
Following the IPKat's earlier post on the German Bundesgerichtshof decision on Lundbeck's escitalopram patent, the Kat's plea for an English translation of the German original has been kindly answered by German IP practice Hoffmann Eitle. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 1:31 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:39 am
The CA agreed with the reasoning in a recent Hong Kong case which examined the English law on the question whether an employee may be a fiduciary and which concluded that this type of barring order could be made to protect the solicitor/client relationship but it was not appropriate to extend this type of order to the employer/employee relationship. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:58 pm
An early decision interpreting the VARA (English v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:06 am
Cir. 1923; State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 8:00 am
S.522/A.1559: Requires a board of elections in a city of over one million to provide the same information in Russian that it provides in languages other than English. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:10 am
Supreme Court, state, and English jurisprudence requiring jury selection to be “public. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:37 pm
The jurisdiction granted by the federal and state legislation only is constitutional under the "effects test" of Calder v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 10:27 am
See Naylor v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:43 am
With so little time in which to make their oral submissions to the Court of Justice, counsel had to resort to extreme measures to make their point At the time of posting this item, there's no sign of the Advocate General's keenly-awaited Opinion in Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd. [read post]
