Search for: "Fine v. Fine" Results 6901 - 6920 of 16,012
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2016, 9:00 am by Chain | Cohn | Stiles
These “mixed-motive” terminations were recently addressed by the California Supreme Court in Harris v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
For example, a federal appeals court ruled in White v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:25 pm by Jeff Redding
  In short, there is a much more fine-grained analysis of this entire situation that could (and should) be done. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Keefe (1971)), or identifies shoppers who are refusing to comply with a boycott, and implicitly urges their friends to ostracize them (see NAACP v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
[PBA] and the County of Nassau entered into a collective bargaining agreement that, in pertinent part, provided that police officers “subject to a fine, penalty, or suspension of 10 or more days without pay, or its monetary equivalent,” had the option of proceeding to binding arbitration in lieu of a departmental disciplinary hearing. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
 The magazine was fined £10,000 for its contempt of court (a finding have been made in November 2015 [2015] EWHC 3322 (Admin)). [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:14 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Other penalties apply including large fines, felony record, loss of certain civil rights, and participation in mandatory substance abuse programs. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:14 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Other penalties apply including large fines, felony record, loss of certain civil rights, and participation in mandatory substance abuse programs. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 2:21 pm by Robert Van De Veire
Our thorough knowledge of securities law’s history and fine points makes us ideal consultants for investors who have suffered losses due to misadvice from their broker or other financial counsel. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 2:11 pm by D. Daxton White
The reason we’re talking about FINRA arbitration rather than court is because when you established your brokerage relationship at the very beginning in your first documentation that you signed with the brokerage firm, somewhere buried in the fine print of that document is an agreement that said something to the effect of if you have a dispute with us you agree to waive your right to sue us in court and to instead sue us through arbitration. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 12:17 pm by Seaton & Lohr
Finally in 2010 the NH Supreme Court fine tuned the Doctrine under current law in Southern New Hampshire Medical Center v. [read post]