Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 21,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2021, 6:26 am
The owner/operator of the building may be held liable as a third-party defendant. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:13 pm
In other words, plaintiffs are contesting the substance and manner of [defendant’s] training. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
More generally, the majority’s implication that Section 230 is available only when a defendant “simply maintain[s] neutral policies prohibiting or limiting certain content” is ludicrous. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:33 pm
The defendant argued that it could not be held liable because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:42 pm
The defendant argued that coal emissions to land, coal emissions from land to water, and coal dust emissions are not point source discharges. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 10:32 am
According to the court’s written opinion, the defendant was driving a tractor-trailer to make a delivery in another state when the driver got into an accident, seriously injuring a mother and daughter inside another vehicle. [read post]
14 May 2013, 3:24 am
Judge Scheindlin’s dismissal motion grant in the Barclays case follows Judge Buchwald’s March 2013 ruling in the consolidated Libor-related antitrust litigation largely granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
Johnson’s summary is posted on the Internet at:http://www.employmentlawdaily.com/index.php/news/who-can-be-liable-under-ny-law-barring-criminal-history-bias-question-certified-to-ny-high-court/? [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:04 am
A key part of the Defendant's case was that a reasonable defendant would have contacted a lawyer following receipt of their letter. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 11:20 am
If the trier of facts in this matter finds the defendant liable and awards damages to the plaintiffs, then the plaintiffs' receipt of the insurance payment may be relevant as a possible setoff against the damages award (see CPLR 4545[c]; Fisher v Qualico Contr. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 8:49 pm
United States), and the next on the extent to which criminal asset forfeiture can result in making criminal co-conspirators jointly and severally liable through seizure of their legitimate assets for any dissipation of the forfeitable assets by another conspirator (Honeycutt v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:17 pm
And the federal government, rather than defend the suits against them on the merits, has raised every possible procedural argument. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:56 pm
See Also: RIAA Says Thomas Shirking $222000 Payoff RIAA Rips Defendant in Nation's First Filesharing Jury Trial RIAA Juror: 'We Wanted to Send a Message' Dixie Chicks: Exhibit A in Latest RIAA Pirate Litigation RIAA Maintains Woman's Guilt Even After Dropping Case [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
General negligence claims require showing that: the defendant had a legal duty to use a certain level of care toward the plaintiff; the defendant failed to meet the standard of care required; the plaintiff suffered damages; and the defendant’s failure to meet the standard of care caused the plaintiff’s damages. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
The federal court explained that “whether MBNA is actually liable under 10(b) and whether certain defendants are ‘controlling persons’ within the meaning of 20(a) are questions of fact that the court is not willing to resolve at the pleadings stage. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:31 am
Here, the plaintiff presented ample evidence establishing both her damages and the defendant’s contribution to them. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 4:22 pm
The injured woman’s proof focused on the car manufacturer’s warranty when it sold the car that it was safe and suitable for everyday road travel when it knew that its design made the car susceptible to rollover accidents. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 11:31 am
Dorsey, however, argued that Reider could be held liable under the first and third exceptions. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 5:29 pm
At trial, the defendant successfully argued that they were entitled to summary judgment because the drain was an open and obvious danger. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 7:53 am
By the time the subject offer was delivered, it ought to have been apparent to the defendants that they would be found wholly or at least substantially liable for the accident [read post]
