Search for: "R. D. C." Results 6901 - 6920 of 20,634
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Intitulé : R. c. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 7:32 pm by Bill Marler
(d) Any renegotiated agreement that would reduce a Claimant’s general damages payment to less than $150.00 will be submitted to Claimants to afford them an opportunity to object or to exclude themselves. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 12:30 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Both at the date of the service of the notice under section 8 of this Act relating to the proceedings for possession and at the date of the hearing— (a) if rent is payable weekly or fortnightly, at least eight weeks’ rent is unpaid; (b) if rent is payable monthly, at least two months’ rent is unpaid; (c) if rent is payable quarterly, at least one quarter’s rent is more than three months in arrears; and (d) if rent is payable yearly, at least three… [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Sa préparation, sur l’heure du dîner du 23 avril 2013, d’une série de requêtes en émission d’un bref de prohibition, dans une situation juridique qui ne commandait nullement une telle procédure, tout autant que le maintien de la présentation de ces procédures, constituent deux gestes réfléchis et ne résultent pas de l’ignorance des règles de… [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:31 am by Aaron Rubin and Leanne Ta
Therefore, the court held, the Terms of Service “unambiguously foreclose[d]” Song Fi’s claims for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:31 am by Aaron Rubin and Leanne Ta
Therefore, the court held, the Terms of Service “unambiguously foreclose[d]” Song Fi’s claims for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:16 am by Daniel Schwartz
Nevertheless, on the overarching question of whether (HR Director) Garrioch controlled plaintiff’s rights under the FMLA, there seems to be ample evidence to support the conclusion that she did: deposition testimony and email exchanges demonstrate a) that Garrioch reviewed Graziadio’s FMLA paperwork, b) that she determined its adequacy, c) that she controlled Graziadio’s ability to return to work and under what conditions, and d) that she sent Graziadio nearly… [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:56 am by Ron Coleman
It isn’t immediately obvious; you’d think that the question is whether or not such works of creativity are copyrightable subject matter or not. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
”   If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, or op-ed relating to the Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
” Instead, it concluded that Garrioch could be an employer: Nevertheless, on the overarching question of whether Garrioch controlled plaintiff’s rights under the FMLA, there seems to be ample evidence to support the conclusion that she did: deposition testimony and email exchanges demonstrate a) that Garrioch reviewed Graziadio’s FMLA paperwork, b) that she determined its adequacy, c) that she controlled Graziadio’s ability to return to work and… [read post]