Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 13,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2014, 3:05 pm
United States, 121 U.S.App. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
”) California v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 9:23 pm
United States, 272 U.S. 52, 110–39 (1926) (executive power); INS v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:15 pm
Department of Commerce's United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") will host its first Cybersecurity Partnership Meeting tomorrow, Friday, November 14, 2014, in Menlo Park, California. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 10:11 am
(See United States of America v. 1.41 Acres of Land (N.D. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:00 am
United States (Redux). [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
On November 5, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in an unpublished disposition, issued its opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
On November 5, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in an unpublished disposition, issued its opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 1:07 pm
Via FourthAmendment.com, I learned about the California Court of Appeal case of People v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 12:11 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted judgment on the pleadings to CAIR on Savage's copyright claim, finding that their Fair Use defense was established by the pleadings themselves. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 12:11 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted judgment on the pleadings to CAIR on Savage's copyright claim, finding that their Fair Use defense was established by the pleadings themselves. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:38 am
Superior Court (Johnson) considered the interplay between the United States Supreme Court’s 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
Whitaker v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 1:44 pm
EFF Files Amicus Brief on Behalf of Tech Pioneers in Oracle v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:42 am
Paz v. [read post]
